Русал (Rusal, RUAL)

С такой долей EN+ у ВТБ, рекомендация ВТБ-капитала не удивительна

Читал я. Не факт, что бумага будет расти. Своё бы вернуть. Может дойти до цены моего входа и повалиться снова вниз.

Вот скоро Русал сделают маржинальным, разрешат и лонг и шорт, а раз разрешат шорты, то бумага вниз ходит в таких случаях гораздо резвее.

Так что лишь бы успеть как можно быстрее выскочить.

уже сделали многие

Ну и кого шорты уже есть?

32 шорт напрашивался очень.

Тогда закономерен и основной вопрос:
Если вы настолько не уверены(что готовы выйти даже без прибыли, несмотря на то что взяли на себя ВСЕ риски) в фундаментале бумаги(явно позитивном), то на кой же ляд вы вообще в неё полезли?!!

финам, открытки, втб, у БКС пока нет. У кого другие броки тоже могут отписаться

Открытие в шорт не даёт. Ща лично проверил.

маржинальным сделали, разве не дает после этого? сам не проверял
Проверил щас - финам шортить тож не дает, но маржинальным сделано

Кстати вопрос Русала из затронут на завтрашнем санкционном заседании.
Хз чем кончится

Rusal Delisting

Last month, the Treasury Department removed three sanctioned Russian companies –EN+, Rusal, and JSC EuroSibEnergo (“ESE”) – from U.S. sanctions lists. Treasury originally sanctioned the companies in April 2018 because they were majority owned by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, who was simultaneously sanctioned for bad acts including support of Putin’s malign agenda. Under U.S. law, companies that are 50% or more owned by a sanctioned person are effectively subject to sanctions themselves (“the 50 Percent Rule”), but Treasury chose to take the extra step of specifically designating these entities.8Treasury has stated that the purpose of sanctioning Rusal, EN+, and ESE was not because of the companies’ conduct, but because of their relationship with Deripisaka, a noted bad actor with close ties to Putin.9 It argues that per the individual sanctions, dividends on his remaining holdings will be paid into frozen accounts that Deripaska cannot use unless he is personally removed from sanctions lists. It notes that Deripaska has personally suffered costs as a result of the sanctions: according to Forbes magazine estimates, Deripaska has lost roughly $3 billion, half of his net worth, since the sanctions were imposed. Also, under the terms of the agreement, he is losing some of his shares and operational control of his most important business interests. There was immediate uproar from companies and countries engaged in the worldwide aluminum market due to the negative impact of these designations, an unintended consequence of the action.10 Thus, in December, after months of discussion and extension of licenses to delay the implementation of the April sanctions, Treasury, the companies, and Deripaska reached a deal in which Deripaska agreed to reduce his ownership shares in the companies to 45%, five percentage points below the threshold to trigger the 50 Percent Rule.Nonetheless, a Congressional effort to overturn the delisting decision was not successful.11Deripaska not only states that he does not separate himself from the Russian state,12 but he is accused of multiple criminal acts13 and is a former business associate of Paul Manafort, PresidentTrump’s now-convicted former campaign manager.14 The delistings were viewed by many as offering Deripaska and Putin a sweetheart deal given that Deripaska retains 45% ownership of their shares.15 He may also retain control as portions of Deripaska’s shares were transferred to a foundation that he founded as well as to relatives and related entities. Further, under the terms of the deal, some of Deripaska’s reduced shares in EN+ are being transferred to VTB, itself a sanctioned Russian bank, which will allow him to satisfy debts that Deripaska owes VTB; while Treasury has said that the agreement gives no “cash” to Deripaska, this debt forgiveness is worth millions of dollars to Deripaska.Although Treasury has previously removed companies from U.S. sanctions lists in response to ownership changes, it’s unusual for OFAC to let the sanctioned owner retain a stake as large as 45%. The removal also sends a clouded message to the world about the U.S. commitment to isolate Russia’s economy. Treasury’s decision to delist these companies could effectively “white list” them, enabling them to attract foreign capital and commercial engagement without fear of consequences from the U.S. At the same time, Rusal and EN+ continue to contribute to the Russia’s ongoing military expansion and are indirectly are “working against American interests and helping Russia violate international law.